“The social media nuisance in this country (Nigeria) is outrageous” – Na’Allah

In the past week, there has been an ambitious bill passed in the Nigerian Senate to send to prison for two years anyone who makes false allegation against a public officer or institution on any form of media – print, TV, radio and social media.

As expected, the social media fanatics have not taken this information lightly and are calling out all the Senators supporting the bill as well as those who claim not to be supporting the bill but are clearly not standing against it.

The big question here is “Is there any sense to this bill”? Do these Senators have a point? Or is this simply a maneuver to cover up their illegal and corrupt practices by preventing people from speaking up in what is supposed to be a democratic nation?

Whatever the real truth is, we would never know but what I do know is that the bill’s sponsor Ibn Bala Na’Allah who is a member of the All Progressives Congress (APC) representing Kebbi South was not mincing words when he said “The social media nuisance in this country is outrageous”.

I completely and unequivocally agree with him. The entire social media has become a place where people throw stones, daggers, formulate lies, false claim and carry out so much cruelty – under the umbrella of so called “freedom of speech”.

Does it really have to be that way?

I am of the opinion that if there was a law set out to curb the amount of trash that is said on social media (and we must admit that social media especially twitter is 85% trash and 15% accurate information), people would ensure to evaluate the authenticity of whatever information they choose to share with others.

A major point those against this bill are stressing is the fact that Nigeria is a democratic country and the bill sets out to restrain access to the internet and social media, curtail the freedom of the press, and online content in illegitimate, disproportionate, or otherwise unlawful and abusive ways.

But I say to them, are we really going to let people get away with all the inappropriate modes of speech currently being targeted at certain individuals, institutions and trends?

Let me just say that this is not only about the government.

802Recently, a young lady known as Sugabelly recounted her unfathomable ordeal in the hands of some group of boys that can be termed “the children of the fortunate” and what did she get in return? Backlash, name calling, arrows, daggers, and basically, everyone had something not so nice to say.

Even as much as Sugabelly made a grievous accusation and I definitely sympathize with her but someone made a comment which I can’t help but agree with and it reads below.

Rape is bad. No one should be a victim. But victims should please have facts when accusing people. We shouldn’t destroy someone’s life based on pinky promise alone that the victims are saying the truth”.

Moving on from the Sugabelly story, there have been so many cases of false accusations that have trended and tainted the names, reputation and like the comment above said, destroyed the lives of so many people, all thanks to social media.

We may not be able to relate to that but ask someone who has fallen victim to the incorrigible nature of social media fanatics and you might just have a rethink of it all.

Social media is undoubtedly fun – the tweets, retweets, likes, follow, etc. BUT should we really be willing to do all of that at the detriment of someone’s life without bothering to investigate the claim and make sure it’s accurate?

That is exactly what this bill (if successfully passed) hopes to do.

The aim is to ensure there is an essential validation of information before it is passed onto the World Wide Web.

Honestly, I do not see anything wrong with that. As a matter of fact, I think it should have been done sooner.

Clearly, those fighting it are the ones who abuse their so called “freedom of speech” by passing out untrue and unjust information whilst basking in the joy of seeing it spread uncontrollably.

Those people should be called to order.

The social media bill isn’t going to take away our freedom of speech rather it is ensuring that we do not ruin people’s lives by spreading false information.

So if you can’t do the time, DON’T DO THE CRIME!

What do you think of the social media bill the Nigerian Senate is currently passing?

Feel free to share your comments, opinion and suggestions.

Please subscribe to the blog’s YouTube Channel; A Loco Viva Voce (click the link to subscribe) and also subscribe to the BBM Channel by scanning the BBM Channel Barcode on the sidebar or add Channel Pin and LIKE the A Loco Viva Voce Facebook Page also on the sidebar.

For instant email updates on recent posts, click the “Follow” icon on the side bar or follow on Twitter @alocovivavoce or Instagram @alocovivavoce or join the A Loco Viva Voce group on Facebook.

PS: Words are an expression of opinion; WRITING is SPEAKING!



5 replies »

  1. In my opinion, The Social Media Bill can be quite a genius idea. However, it is going against the one of the Human rights acts: Freedom of Speech, which is the freedom to speak without censorship.

    Undoubtedly,social media has constituted so much nuisance not just in our country, but in the whole world at large. A lot of groups, countries and individuals have been hurt severally and wicked people hide behind their computer screens to spit out evil about other people especially the case of Sugabelly. Social Media comes with a lot of lies and accusations, mockery etc, but in it comes some truth as well. Like everything else, Social media has its good and bad, and we cannot use because of the “bad” scrap it. The bill smells of the dictatorship era where people cant speak out else they would be killed. I think Nigeria has passed that era a long time ago.

    I think the Senate should focus on more important bills like how to improve the agriculture, create more job opportunities and empower the Youth (all are being done already but they should focus more on it) rather than to think of ways to imprison anyone who speaks out without censorship just because they might have hurt their feelings.


    • As much as I get the point of it being against freedom of speech and what not, why are people intentionally falsifying malicious contents about their fellow being? That’s the part I don’t understand.

      It’s fun to read and since 85% of social media content is falsified then I guess the “Nigerian” social media will no longer be fun which is probably why fanatics are fighting against it.

      Basically, people are willing to have a little bit of fun at the expense of the reputation and livelihood of a fellow being. Very sad!


  2. If someone writes lies, then sue the person. The law is al]ready there. hen people start suing and getting convictions, social media will regulate itself automatically.


    • Well.. you have a point. But then again, I really don’t think anyone will have anything to worry about with this law of they simply wrote the truth.

      I agree we probably need to revisit the libel and defamation laws but truth is if they were really efficient, they probably wouldn’t bother to create this new law would they?

      So the problem probably lies with our judiciary system and should be fixed otherwise even this social media law wouldn’t make any difference


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s